Comments on: YES ON 37 REFUSES TO CHALLENGE VOTE FRAUD!

By: mponepone1

mponepone1 — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:25:50 +0000

The early votes would most likely FAVOR Prop 37. What is going on here? It seems like Yes On 37 was paid off or threatened by Monsanto and company and that needs even further investigating.

We could be witnessing the most rampant example of voting fraud in modern history. From a 90% voter approval rating 6 months ago to defeat is nothing short of manipulation at work.

Aren’t there any Google workers who care about GMO’s? Can’t they help to push this issue into the national spotlight? With more people investigating, it will put more pressure for the votes to be recounted ACCURATELY.

Jon, thanks for the great work so far.

By: Chloe

Chloe — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:49:14 +0000

Really, should the Prop 37 spokespeople assume that those of us in the trenches feel the same way???? Wow, that’s just as disappointing than the “result” of the vote. Can’t we demand a full recount?

By: X

Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:14:28 +0000

Why in God’s name would you spend millions of dollars getting an initiative on the ballot, getting people hyped on it, and then giving up? WTF? I am outraged. I spent countless hours campaigning for Prop 37 and then to have it thrown in my face that they are “assuming” the uncounted votes are nos. Didn’t your mom always tell you don’t assume, you’ll make an ass of yourself!! OMG I’m so pissed!!!!

By: MJ

MJ — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:41:00 +0000

Not surprised at all. This was a multi-pronged attack on Prop 37. The $40 million of deceptive advertising was just a diversion so that people could complain afterwards, “see, the bastards bought the election.” That diverts attention from the fact that massive vote fraud was planned all along by the NO ON 37 people, probably with government help.

The result would have been the same even without the advertising. The advertising was just part of the charade, just like the charade of the presidential election. Obama’s victory was decided long before November, and Romney knew that; he was just a palooka playing the role of serious candidate on behalf of his elitist masters. All part of the sham election.

Also, no doubt “Yes on 37” was infiltrated by provocateurs, or even totally created by them. It may have been a “controlled opposition” group. The objective, as someone else pointed out, may have been to create the protest and then definitively defeat it at the polls, so they could say that the controversy had now been settled, by “the people,” and GMOs have the people’s seal of approval.

I am not in California so didn’t see YES on 37’s commercials. Were they ineffective, airy-fairy spots? Softballs, while the opposition were throwing hardballs and spitters? That would be expected of a phony provocateur YES group. I’ve seen this kind of advertising done many many times by the ostensible good guys in many different causes, and of course it never works.

Of course the press did their usual thing. Not just the mainstream press, even the alternative press is infiltrated. They are all controlled opposition.

And did any major newspaper even carry the story about the French study of GMOs? Based on a Google News search, the major media didn’t even report the study until later when the Biotech-funded science establishment got together to denounce it. There were no “French study finds GMO corn gives rats tumors” headlines in the major media, only “European Scientists denounce flawed French GMO study” headlines.

By: Laila Jameson

Laila Jameson — Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:51:29 +0000

There is a group of lawyers that are suing BIG CHEM corporations. I read the article and posted it on FB a couple of months ago. These are some of the same lawyers that went after the tobacco companies that were also similarly protected . Just because they have their big bad daddy to hide behind ( the government seats, and a few new laws they’ve had passed for their own protection, so as to have carte blanche with regard to whatever practices they chose to use) doesn’t mean we can’t bring them down. THIS ISN’T the time to give up, it’s the time to get crackin. They, the big chem corporations are scared, and they are scared for a REAL REASON. That alone should be enough to make us band together RIGHT NOW and go after what we want, because we can, and WE CAN WIN. If that’s not enough then just look at the lists that are out there of the food companies, the food manufacturers and chemical manufacturers that laid down millions against prop 37. That’s the list of companies you are to boycott. By donating to the NO campaign, they provided us with a WONDERFUL basic list of who & what to boycott. They have NOW GOT TO BE freaking out that they even did that. It lets you know right off the bat who is selling GE junk to us, the really dangerous stuff. I’m actually glad they did donate so I really know who THEY are even without labeling. It’s brilliant, and gives us even MORE FUEL FOR OUR FIRE. Let’s do this thing!! The time is NOW!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:04:03 +0000

Perhaps somebody could organize a fundraiser for such a PR attack campaign. An online Money Bomb could get the ball rolling. Then another to keep it going. I’ll donate if Jon will put it together.

By: Laila Jameson

Laila Jameson — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:29:22 +0000

I have NO intention of taking this as a defeat. I see it as just the beginning and that WE will win. Sure I want labeling, but ultimately I want a full ban, AND THEY know it. They know that’s the general direction that labeling leads to so they are fighting with every dirty tactic they can, but it doesn’t scare me or slow me down. They know that what they do reaches far beyond the health of each individual and is actually destroying our environment. Let them bring it on. Let me know what else I can do. If they didn’t know WE DO HAVE THE POWER, then they wouldn’t have fought with both guns blazing!!!! WE DO, WE THE PEOPLE CAN DEFEAT THESE BEASTS, and like I said, THEY know it. 🙂

By: Sarah Loeb

Sarah Loeb — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:28:00 +0000

Good job, Jon. Wow, you get awfully Neitzschean there toward the end. But you are absolutely right. As long as we hold ourselves to a higher “moral” standard than that of our enemies, we will lose. And we ARE losing. … This SHOULD be viewed as a fight for survival… It IS, after all, about food!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:55:23 +0000

Did you know the Yes on 37 side had been attacked by mainstream newspapers? They called us the criminals for filing a complaint with the FDA and FBI for their criminal use of the FDA logo.

By: Linda Ugelow

Linda Ugelow — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:25:23 +0000

Like you, I am flabbergasted by the lack of outrage and the capitulation of the movement to the stated results. I would have thought that fighting any suspicion of foul play would have to be part of the strategy of the initiative. Now the people have to put pressure on these movement leaders to take continued action.