End result? The anti-GMO community is fractured – the “label GMOs” crowd vs. the “ban GMOs” crowd – and the biotech industry is more powerful than ever.

Why did the Organic Consumers Association promote “Yes On 37”? Because they are funded by the Rockefellers who own a substantial stake in the biotech industry. Yes, the Organic Consumers Association was created by the biotech industry in order to fracture the anti-GMO movement to where it has no teeth.

Sometimes you just got to start somewhere!

The labeling initiative was far better than doing absolutely NOTHING.

If one were to take a part from THEIR playbook, one would use such a victory as could have been possible with Prop 37 and expanded it to include greater restrictions on delivery, sale, and production of GMO-crops. The “other side” has done this for a very long time. It is called “incrementalism”. It is a valid strategy that can also work FOR the People, if it is successfully used BY the People.

Rather than bash and slam any strategy, in its totality, for merely “scratching the surface” – how about explaining the weaknesses of relying solely on its possible victories, instead of using such victories as “stepping-stones” to accomplish greater things ahead??? = THAT is how battles, and eventually – WARS, are won.

Genetically engineered plant varieties cannot coexist alongside natural-bred varieties; this is a given. Through cross-pollination, GE plants will eventually contaminate and overcome non-GE varieties. There is no safe barrier between the two. You can’t have both type plants and expect labeling to save you or destruction of the food chain.

Labeling initiatives placate GMO opponents and instills the impression of “winning” against the monster. Labeling gives Monsanto authority to sow its deadly harvest with impunity and be accepted by society. Monsanto wins either way, with or without labeling. And unless GMOs are eliminated altogether, someday in the foreseeable near future, the entire food supply will be damaged beyond repair.

There can be no compromise or negotiation with a murderer who intends to kill you. You flee, fight back and prevail, or die. Ultimately, their global agenda is genocide (under the cloak of greed). Monsanto and its biotech counterparts intend to kill you […]

Know this: the chant for labeling to identify GMOs in food comes from the biotech giants, not thinking people. Monsanto initiated both the call for more GMOs in the biosphere, as well as its opposition (labeling). The debate over labeling GMO food has obscured the real issue of educating the public on the dangers of GMOs and banning GMO crops entirely.

The following ref identifies some of the culprits behind the faux labeling initiatives.

http://www.nickbrannigan.com/articles/is-just-label-it-controlled-opposition.htm

Below is a a link to an article that provides excellent insight into the dangers of glyphosate (in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide) and GE foods. However, like many alternative health resources, it also includes the misguided mantra for labeling GMOs. And like mockingbirds, many well-intentioned people are now singing Monsanto’s deadly song.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/05/14/glyphosate.aspx

You mention the secret pact to dominate the global food supply… I would love to hear you apply this sort of analysis to the Secret Team that all other secret teams report to. I am meaning the Chemical Companies. IG Farben. Something I know that many don’t know? Allied Chemical Corportion was America’s answer to the IG Farben after WWI. This is not ever discussed, not even by people like you. Allied became HONEYWELL. I have my suspicions that this means HONEYWELL is a candidate for Top Dog, at least of the American Set.

Now, that tip about the APL-OSS-CIA progression and Honeywell are not things they teach in school. I have more secrets respond to this if you want em 🙂

Monsanto will mean the death of our food supply if we don’t put an end to them.

It’s common knowledge that they won’t even ingest their own FrankenFoods!

Why should we pay to be guinea pigs for their profit?