Comments on: The trial of an artist https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2014/02/20/the-trial-of-an-artist/ NoMoreFakeNews.com Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:07:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.10 By: nomark https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2014/02/20/the-trial-of-an-artist/#comment-7291 Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:07:44 +0000 http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=5558#comment-7291 There is a flaw in the case. The judge said:

“No it doesn’t. Some force ultimately pushed you out of the hive.”

If “some force” pushed the man out, then the man is not guilty. He is not responsible for the actions of others. If the man pulled himself out, then he is free, as he stated. But the judge is in error. He cannot find the artist guilty because he is not the cause of the transgression by the judges own argument. “Some force” is guilty. If the source of the force is the man, he is free. But if not, then the source must be the collective, therefore the collective is guilty, not the man.

]]> By: chipster https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2014/02/20/the-trial-of-an-artist/#comment-7290 Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:42:27 +0000 http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=5558#comment-7290 This is terrifying stuff Jon. Keep it up.

]]> By: bleak https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2014/02/20/the-trial-of-an-artist/#comment-7289 Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:38:00 +0000 http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=5558#comment-7289 The Artists’ mother gave the judge jurisdiction when she signed his “Certificate of Birth.” It made him property of the corporation and an investment on the stock exchange. It reads… Name: ARTIST. The Artist failed to reclaim his sovereignty and rescind the contract. Like you say, Mr R, they will eventually catch up to that if we let them.

]]> By: The trial of an artistNot Exactly The News | Not Exactly The News https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2014/02/20/the-trial-of-an-artist/#comment-7288 Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:04:06 +0000 http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=5558#comment-7288 […] Jon Rappoport’s Blog […]

]]>