DeStefano says: “it’s a ‘possibility’ that vaccines rarely trigger autism but ‘it’s hard to predict who those children might be.’”

In that case, Elizabeth Cohen should put a new video online saying: “Autism should be listed as side effect – or to say it another way because some people do not hear this well – vaccines may trigger autism but “it’s hard to predict who those children might be”.

According to DeStefano It’s hard to predict who those children might be, but according to the same DeStefano : When the child is still in the womb, the brain is already developing the wiring that will manifest in autism. According to Jon, DeStefano is serial lying liar.

~~~~

Parents continue to express concern that vaccines cause autism… …that sentimate was present in 2008, when the declared autism rate, declared by the CDC, was 1 in 150 children. The rate stated in 2012 is 1 in 68 children!

Note: Below,… in an official March 2013 press release — regarding the results of a 2013 study — which has DeStefano’s name on it, the press release references a 2004 study. Could that 2004 study referenced be the very 2004 study that Thompson recently blew the whistle on?

~~~~

April 4, 2008

Jenny McCarthy: My son’s recovery from autism

By Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey
Special to CNN

[snip]

“We believe what helped Evan recover was starting a gluten-free, casein-free diet, vitamin supplementation, detox of metals, and anti-fungals for yeast overgrowth that plagued his intestines. Once Evan’s neurological function was recovered through these medical treatments, speech therapy and applied behavior analysis helped him quickly learn the skills he could not learn while he was frozen in autism. After we implemented these therapies for one year, the state re-evaluated Evan for further services. They spent five minutes with Evan and said, ‘What happened? We’ve never seen a recovery like this.’

“Evan is now 5 years old and what might surprise a lot of you is that we’ve never been contacted by a single member of the CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or any other health authority to evaluate and understand how Evan recovered from autism. When Evan meets doctors and neurologists, to this day they tell us he was misdiagnosed — that he never had autism to begin with. It’s as if they are wired to believe that children can’t recover from autism.

[snip]

“Many people aren’t aware that in the 1980s our children received only 10 vaccines by age 5, whereas today they are given 36 immunizations, most of them by age 2. With billions of pharmaceutical dollars, could it be possible that the vaccine program is becoming more of a profit engine then a means of prevention?”

[snip]

We take into account that some children have reactions to medicines like penicillin, for example, yet when it comes to vaccines we are operating as if our kids have a universal tolerance for them. We are acting like ONE SIZE FITS ALL. That is, at the very least, a huge improbability.

Even if the CDC is not convinced of a link between vaccines and autism, changing the [CDC’s recommended] vaccine schedule should be seriously considered as a precautionary measure. (If you would like to see some ideas for alternative schedules, check out http://generationrescue.org.)

~~~~~

The CDC’s DeStefano comes out with this… CNN runs with it,…

March 29th, 2013

Vaccine-autism connection debunked again

http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2013/03/29/vaccine-autism-connection-debunked-again/comment-page-1/

Many expectant parents are wary of all the recommended vaccines their newborns are supposed to get in the first hours, days and even the first couple of years, believing that too many vaccines too soon may increase their child’s risk for autism.

A new study published [in 2013] in the Journal of Pediatrics…

[Note: the new 2013 study is… “Increasing exposure to antibody-stimulating proteins and polysaccharides in vaccines is not associated with risk of autism,” by Frank DeStefano, MD, MPH, Cristofer S. Price, ScM, and Eric S. Weintraub, MPH, appears in The Journal of Pediatrics (www.jpeds.com), DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.02.001, published by Elsevier. http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476%2813%2900144-3/fulltext%5D

Here is the actual press release that CNN regurgitates,….

The Risk of Autism Is Not Increased by “Too Many Vaccines Too Soon”

http://www.jpeds.com/content/JPEDSDeStefano

“Cincinnati, OH, March 29, 2013 — Although scientific evidence suggests that vaccines do not cause autism, approximately one-third of parents continue to express concern that they do; nearly 1 in 10 parents refuse or delay vaccinations because they believe it is safer than following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) schedule (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/downloads/parent-ver-sch-0-6yrs.pdf). A primary concern is the number of vaccines administered, both on a single day and cumulatively over the first 2 years of life. In a new study scheduled for publication in The Journal of Pediatrics, researchers concluded that there is no association between receiving “too many vaccines too soon” and autism.

[snip]

“An infant’s immune system is capable of responding to a large amount of immunologic stimuli and, from time of birth, infants are exposed to hundreds of viruses and countless antigens outside of vaccination. According to the authors, “The possibility that immunological stimulation from vaccines during the first 1 or 2 years of life could be related to the development of ASD is not well-supported by what is known about the neurobiology of ASDs.” In 2004, a comprehensive review by the Institute of Medicine concluded that there is not a causal relationship between certain vaccine types and autism, and this study supports that conclusion.”

You see in regards to genetically engineered growth hormones in the milk, some (now former) FOX investigative reporters in Florida did an expose on how it increased risk of cancer.

FOX then got threatened by lawyers for Monsanto (Something to the effect of ‘no more Round-Up commercials paying for your newscast if you report this’). So the station manager attempted to not just refuse to air the story, but tried to BRIBE the reporters to keep quiet about it. The reporters asked to get a copy of that bribe in writing, which the station manager provided…and they used that as evidence in court….and here comes the big finnish…

The judge hearing the case ruled that FOX did lie etc. but basically ruled that there is no law that states the news they report must be correct.

So they can literally go on TV and say that drinking bleach mixed with ammonia gives you healthy skin…even though anyone trying that would most probably die a horrible death.

Just curious, if, in the lawyering that went on in that statute, the words ‘entertainment’ and ‘news’ effectively mean just ‘entertainment’.

In the article published by CNN. it says: “several studies indicate it starts in utero, long before a child is given the MMR or any other vaccinations”.

They use the word “INDICATE”, but If you click on the link (“several studies”):
http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/08/new-study-suggests-autism-starts-in-the-womb/
This time the study doesn’t “indicate”, the study “SUGGESTS” that something “MAY BE CAUSED” by something and because of this, it “MAY EXPLAIN” something…