“The use of a germ as a cover story for a chemical.
“In other words, there is no germ attack. It’s called a germ attack, but that’s a lie. The perps bring in researchers, to the affected area, who go on to claim they have isolated a germ that is the cause of death and illness. It’s a sham. What really happened was the spread of a toxic chemical that can’t be detected, unless you’re looking for it.”
—Jon Rappoport
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/05/18/how-they-would-stage-a-bioterror-event/
]]>Virus means poison (chemicals)
All methods that assume to make identification are INDIRECT methods!
Utterly Intangible!
A simple analogy clarifies this simple matter that eludes the educated.
I have a bag full of nuts and bolts from a scrapyard.
From this evidence I claim as an expert/authority that all vehicles in the scrapyard are Ford Mondeos.
The ubiquitous nuts and bolts are no different to ubiquitous protiens which our bodies recycle and discard continually in the trillions.
PCR replicates proteins, but since a complete so called pathogenc virus has never been isolated, how is it possible to identify the even smaller constituent parts?
The simple answer is that it is NOT!
The very same appleis to genetics – NOT POSSIBLE and another complete hoax.
It is the age of the chemical masquerade ! – used to geopolitical ends!
]]>Only we the people united can prevent a repeat of 1918 in 2014 with vaccine-induced ebola.
]]>When they say “Ebola is spreading” How in hell do they know? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST? WHAT TEST?
W H A T – T E S T ?????
I am absolutley astounded as to the lack of ANY verification we are getting about HOW these “Ebola patients” are being tested? If you think a PCR test is specific your are wrong. You can’t get an Ebola test at Walmart. (at least not yet)
I keep searching articles for conformation of Ebola infection and the means used, and for some reason EVERYONE seems to have shut off the VITAL information to CONFIRM Ebola infection.
Do you believe this just because some white-coated lab rat says so? I don’t trust the CDC, (after 30 years of lies about HIV testing) and neither should you, when they say the have confirmed Ebola. That is not saying Ebola infection is not true. It is just that we NEVER hear any source state which specific test for Ebola is used to “confirm” this.
All of the INCREDIBLE hoopla and NO TEST mentioned or confirmed!
Here is what CDC lists as Testing: (my comments) ELISA and PCR are very prone to error. Culture may be most accurate if “ebola” grows as would be predicted. Right now, the sloppy verification of “Ebola ” testing is both dangerous to conduct and incredibly prone to error.
According to the CDC:
Within a few days after symptoms begin
Antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing
IgM ELISA
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Virus isolation
Later in disease course or after recoveryIgM and IgG antibodies
Retrospectively in deceased patients Immunohistochemistry testing
PCR
Virus isolation
The rat poison is what your mother-in-law takes to thin her blood, and it’s Very bad stuff, very.
]]>