Comments on: The Matrix Revealed: the individual with power

By: Lynn

Lynn — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:29:49 +0000

you are right on! I knew someone else got it!

By: JK Rowling gets it

JK Rowling gets it — Sat, 15 Nov 2014 22:51:27 +0000

Honestly, I think you’ve missed the point of the Harry Potter books. Read them. All of them.

The Death Eaters are the Pharmaceutical Industry. According to them, only those who are vaccinated deserve to be part of society (including having access to “wands” and education).

The Ministry of Magic are the scientists and researchers. Most of them mean well, but are easily corrupted and even more easily fooled.

The “healers” at St. Mungo’s are the doctors. They, too, mean well, but really have no clue.

I’m not politically savvy enough to guess who Voldemort is, but I’m leaning towards Art Caplan.

By: thepassionofplay

thepassionofplay — Sat, 15 Nov 2014 09:00:36 +0000

Jon, I agree wholeheartedly with your perspective on the “individual”. It reminds of a similar perspective shared by Jiddu Krishnamurti who also spoke of the need to be free from every trace of authority and hierarchy. He spoke eloquently(for 50+ years) of the need to be free from all the experts, all ideologies, all religions, all gurus, all methods, all systems, all myths, all philosophies, all teachings(including his own)–as only then does the true individual come into existence.

To me he was one of the free-est thinkers of this century. You said something else I resonated with:

“Frankly,there are many self-invented victims scattered around the planet who would do exactly the same thing, if they were suddenly outfitted with enormous bank accounts and social position. For every real Rockefeller, there are a thousand would-be’s hoping and lurking in the weeds.”

Indeed, I might even say that for every real Rockefeller there are a ‘million’ would-be’s who would do exactly the same thing with a huge bank account and social position. That is why I don’t give the ‘elite’ any more importance than the ‘grunt’ or the ‘poor man’. They are all one and the same, each sustaining and spawning the other. It’s all one network, no separation. It’s all the collective, with not a single individual or ‘entity’ to be found anywhere therein. When you’ve seen one clone, you’ve seen them all. When you’ve seen one fragmented mind, you’ve seen them all.

By: From Québec

From Québec — Sat, 15 Nov 2014 05:26:57 +0000

WOW! You really did put a lot of work in this Matrix thing.
It’s a life’s commitment.

By: Pat Fields

Pat Fields — Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:06:05 +0000

After self-deception is dispensed with, the avenue of ‘individual empowerment’ is in learning Common Law Process and meticulous thought on how to Hold One’s Court.

Every American man and woman is possessed of full sovereignty until they enter government’s municipal or business jurisdictions (authorities). The objective of Liberty, then, is to meticulously avoid or extricate all such nexus.

“The only reason, I believe, that a free man is bound by human law, is, that he binds himself.” –Chisholm v, Georgia, 2, Dall 440, 455. (1794)

“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power.“ -–Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)

“A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government …” (Kitchens v. Steele 112 F.Supp 383)

By: omanuel

omanuel — Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:33:30 +0000

Thanks, Jon, for your analysis. For reasons given (poorly) below, I am convinced that fear-driven international agreements destroyed the foundations of science and constitutional governments in 1945:

http://junkscience.com/2014/11/14/cato-on-the-showboat-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-302706