Was it not so after WW1 that hospital beds were MT and Big Pharma made aspirin?

Heck, I am in robust med-free health at 77, my last medical was a freebie at a health conference in Hawaii in 1979..Living in the Far East I don’t even need to carry med inssurance.

Hint. vax and massive deliberate misinfo.

NASH: natural, accident, homicide, or suicide — which are used, I am assuming, to help settle legal and insurance issues.

~~~~

Of the “500,000 hospital deaths every year” that Jon mentions, let’s take “suicide” off the table. That leaves natural, accident, and homicide.

So, are we really talking about “homicides” here? Perhaps yes. I would think so. Which, is chilling. But, let’s say that the Powers That Be (though various legal and ‘science’ mashinations) have taken “homicide” off the table. That leaves “natural” and “accident”.

Doesn’t “accident” on the death certificate leave the doctors and hospitals open to lawsuits? But, maybe this is covered, too: Doesn’t a person need to sign a bunch of “waiver forms” before his is first admitted to a hospital? Would one of those “waivers” be “waive right to sue in the invent of death due to ‘accident'”?

Because they can’t get away with putting “natural” on the death certificate, or can they?

Heck, maybe, say, dying “from pancreatic cancer — which included the FULL administering of ‘prescribed’ chemo (poison) and ‘prescribed’ radiation (more poison) — without the administration of vital vitamins and minerals and pure water to counter balance the poison” — is classified as “natural”!

Just thinking out loud…. So, there seems to possibly be a whole other layer going on: The “legal ineligibility” of the families of those “500,000 hospital deaths every year” to sue? Becuase if they all did sue (year after year), then wouldn’t the allopathic medical system go bankrupt?

So, the lawyers in this field know, too, I would think.

~~~~

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_certificate)

http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/forensics/psych_autopsy/index.html

In death certifications, there are three important matters: the cause, mechanism and mode or manner of death.

The cause is an instrument or physical agent used to bring about death (a bullet, for example),

the mechanism is the pathological agent in the body that resulted in the death (excessive bleeding),

and the manner of death, according to the NASH classification, is considered to be natural, accident, homicide or suicide.

Sometimes, although the cause and mechanism of death can be easily determined, the manner cannot. This it is known as an undetermined death.

You are right on that. This following article says it better than me:

Excerpts:

“The modern healthcare monopoly has nothing to gain by keeping people healthy – on the contrary, the more symptom relievers sold, the more seaworthy the shareholders’ yachts.

They deliberately do not delve into the real causes of disease, because that would lead to the slaughter of the goose with the golden eggs: The need for eternal symptom relief.

They are the world’s most powerful lobby and they will not rest until every human being on the planet is their slave. Only when we are medicated from cradle to grave, only when we will be wholly dependent on their expensive pills, only when most of the money we make goes into their pockets they will be satisfied.”

Big Pharma’s War on Health
http://www.unfictional.com/big-pharma-war-on-health

The Flexner Report was one of the opening salvos in the “medical Coup d’état” that took place in America in the early 20th century.

The Flexner Report

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexner_Report

The Flexner Report is a book-length study of medical education in the United States and Canada, written by Abraham Flexner and published in 1910 under the aegis of the Carnegie Foundation. Many aspects of the present-day American medical profession stem from the Flexner Report and its aftermath.

Double blind placebo controlled trials, by definition, test the action of one symptomicine – a treatment for symptoms that does not address cause nor attempt to cure, against a placebo, a ‘fake medicine’, that does not address cause nor attempt to cure.

There is no need for a double blind placebo controlled trial, if you are testing a cure.

If the patient is cured, there is no need to test against a placebo. The only time you need to test against a placebo is when the medicine you are testing WILL NOT CURE. You need to test if it gives the patient more relief from symptoms (eg. pain medication), or the doctor more relief from the signs of illness (eg. statins and hypertension medications).

Double blind placebo controlled trials, the ‘gold standard’ of medicine, are fools gold. And the buyer is the gullible fool. But this religion has taken over medicine so thoroughly that much of the medical profession has also become the gullible fool. No one is searching for cures. The proof: if they are conducting a double blind placebo controlled trial – then clearly the medicine being tested does not cure.

to your health, tracy