The point? You need to make your own decision, and you need the right to make your own decisions. Vaccines, and health, are not about who has ‘science’ on their side, they are fundamental issues about the right to make your own choices, for you own body, and your own children.
tracy

When it comes to the evidence supporting the safety of vaccines, I’m very suspicious of the studies wondering how many have been influenced by Big Pharma funding. Industry-funded trials are more likely to produce a positive. I think this is one area that’s not talked about enough. If these pro-vax studies can be exposed, then they’ll be discredited and we’ll make some progress in this conflict.

For example, there’s a new study just release from JAMA that reports no link found between the MMR & Autism. The pro-vax intellectuals are celebrating as if they won the lotto. However, Age of Autism is saying that this study was funded by the “Lewin Group,” which subsequently receives funding from Big Pharma.

If correct, how unbiased, untainted and objective is this new study?

Imagine that……

Doesn’t that effect the INDUSTRIALISTS?

Best
OT

Once the drug companies lose the profit from vaccines, the rhetoric will change. Why does no one see the extortion perpetrated by these inhuman companies?

They also acknowledge the failure rate of all vaccines. So they want to “protect” as many children as possible by attempting to minimize the spread of viruses.

They even acknowledge that a healthy child doesn’t require vaccination for diseases such as measles. Measles isn’t life-threatening to a healthy child. But that child should nonetheless submit themselves them to a harmful and life-threatening injection to protect the weaker members of the “herd.” The fact they use the term “herd” shows what they think of us.

I think the real holes in the logic are: 1. Studies show that vaccinated children develop weaker immunity to other diseases they weren’t vaccinated for. 2. The vaccines harm the stronger members of the herd, which puts the herd in greater danger. 3. Why not focus on helping the weaker members of the herd get stronger instead of vice versa? 4. Vaccinated mothers have been shown to pass on poor immunity to their children. 5. Vaccines, such as for mumps, don’t provide lifelong immunity, leaving the person vulnerable to a more serious bout of the disease as an adult.

Our local newspaper reprinted a PR piece on vaccines. I immediately wrote a reply which the editor printed. Surprisingly, the local health unit didn’t respond to my list of well referenced reasons why we should be very cautious of vaccines (i.e. don’t use them). Here’s the letter I wrote: http://diabeticdharma.com/discernment/