Comments on: Breaking…Vaxxed, the film you can’t see, will be screened in New York! https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/ NoMoreFakeNews.com Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:00:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.10 By: sleat65 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21211 Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:00:52 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21211 “Will it be released elsewhere in the States????”

As soon as the owners of the film decide to allow ordinary people worldwide (and not just in NYC) to see it.

]]>
By: sleat65 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21210 Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:57:47 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21210 “was available for free within a few months. It always happens”

Right. It will happen the second the owners decide to let it happen. Nothing big pharma can do can prevent ordinary punters from seeing the film in their own living rooms. The only people who can truly prevent people from seeing the film are its owners.

Right now, I’d pay $25 to watch the film only once. But in a few months, perhaps not, who knows?

]]>
By: ANZIE YANGMI https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21209 Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:24:07 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21209 Will it be released elsewhere in the States????

]]>
By: sleat65 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21208 Mon, 11 Apr 2016 01:43:29 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21208 Indeed. Banning an independent film from a handful of film-festivals is almost a guarantee that people will want to watch it, and the Streisand effect guarantees that any attempt to censor the message will amplify it.

Were I trying to promote a film, controversy is the first thing I’d try to create. In this case it at least appears fortuitous.

“The film the vaccine-industrial-complex says you can’t see…until we put it on Hulu and Netflix!”

]]>
By: RAW https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21207 Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:45:43 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21207 Numerous documentaries have been released on the pharma industry in past few years… vaxxed is getting hyped due to the reaction from the industry – the real backfire is due to pharmas attempt at censorship. Great news.. as attention to the subject is amplified!

]]>
By: RAW https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21206 Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:05:28 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21206 Relax… It will become available online in due course. Most documentaries all become available at no charge. The popular pharma documentary called ‘bought’ was available for free within a few months. It always happens…

]]>
By: sleat65 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21205 Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:31:12 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21205 Yes. There’s nothing stopping them.

Kind of sad, really. I imagine the people who conceived of the film, did the creative work, the investigation, the hard yards, etc, are not the same as the people who are currently trying to make sure the film is profitable.

So, maybe the marketing/PR types need to get clued up and drop the hype. Yes, there were strong-arm tactics employed to get Tribeca to drop the film. Everybody gets that. Now let’s see the film. Let’s have the option to go to a local indy cinema, or purchase the right to stream the darn thing! It really isn’t that hard!

If the hype continues much longer, it’ll backfire and people will lose interest. If you keep telling people “you can’t see this film” eventually they’ll go watch something they CAN see.

]]>
By: sleat65 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21204 Fri, 01 Apr 2016 13:33:26 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21204 “I hope the ticket prices are fixed so low that almost anyone can see the film”

Or, here’s a Radical Idea nobody’s ever thought of before. Stream. The Film. Online. For Money. Right Now.

Naaah. That’s silly. Let’s just resume the hand-wringing about 300 people being denied the privilege of seeing it, due to big-pharma strongarm tactics, and arrange for about 10,000 lucky people to see it, while ignoring the fact that the owners could easily arrange for 318 million people (and more) to have the chance to see it as soon as tomorrow, and make their investment back in the process in spades.

]]>
By: Catherine https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21203 Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:16:01 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21203 Presumably to generate publicity and credibility. Anyone can put a film out on YouTube or other media. My student film maker son does it all the time, so the only reason this is the film you can’t see is because the makers are more concerned about how it is released rather than actually making it available.

]]>
By: sleat65 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/#comment-21202 Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:01:32 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=14313#comment-21202 Can anybody explain why the need for such strong exclusivity (only showing in NYC??) on an independent film wholly owned by individuals? It’s digital media, for heaven’s sake. Other indy films have become available within days of being finished. Blockbuster games come own the instant they are ready, everywhere. Why keep the word under wraps un-necessarily?

]]>