Comments on: Winner of last night’s debate was Lester Holt

By: Deanna Clark

Deanna Clark — Fri, 30 Sep 2016 23:53:45 +0000

Yes…Me too! The stage set, lighting, and suggestive poses were as obvious as many other tv gimmicks. I’m still wondering why Georgetown U covered up the big cross behind Obama when he spoke there. Many locals in DC noticed it. This debate was as clever as a commercial for Nike.

By: JB

JB — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:14:08 +0000

My sentiments exactly. I’m also among the group that has “given up” finding suitable employment. Been six years now. I get regular listings from LinkedIn, but not one of them are in the fields of my skillset. I didn’t watch the debate either–never have watched them. Not only are they a circus, a comedy of lies, they’re also nothing more than a repeat of the tired campaign euphemisms intended to poke the opposition in the eye. Historically, the advent of a political messiah has always been the harbinger of complete totalitarianism and subsequent collapse. We allow the overlords to divert our attention from the real solution to these political conundrums, which is to cease viewing government as the panacea for our social dysfunction.

By: Dickard

Dickard — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:01:52 +0000

I don’t watch t.v., but this waste of time “debate” between “opponents” is a farce. Whomever wins the U.S. loses, Zionists shills (all candidates) will lead us down to the end game… N.W.O. . Waste of time and effort to watch this bad play acting, these puppets do what they’re told.

By: Angel Scott

Angel Scott — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:48:51 +0000

Red like the blood of the kidnapped children she had intravenously pumped in to her body.
I wish I were kidding.
Great analysis.

By: plane

plane — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 06:19:14 +0000

Jon,

Trump surely looked out of his element in this debate, but he did succeed in looking less than mean and crazy, which is helpful to those in the middle or relatively indifferent about elections. His ideas were much more those of a salesman than hers.

Personally, I think he seemed unable to decide whether to attack, which is his natural style, or play nice. His advisors are largely pushing the nice guy strategy, and it has been working for the last few weeks.

Not sure if how polished Clinton is will matter. Perhaps 40% of the country will back Clinton; 40% hate Clinton or like Trump; and then there is the rest. It seems to me that a better strategy for the Clinton camp is to try to destroy Trump one way or another. False charges, for example. Or some attempts to ruin his health. Whatever it takes. At the end of the day, undecideds break against the incumbent, and the economic and social situations inside the US are not so good. And she is really unlikable. So she needs to get enough fake polls and cheating on election day to overcome losing by 5-10%.

By: Ozzie Thinker

Ozzie Thinker — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 02:38:42 +0000

But the “brand name” is already in place. It’s called the United (sic) Nations….!

By: Ozzie Thinker

Ozzie Thinker — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 02:24:35 +0000

Forgive me, I missed the “debate” (sic), Jon.

Though it would be remiss of me to comment on something I didn’t witness, I fear your eloquence transcends the occasion. If only you were to step up to the presidential plate, I would hark on everything you said worthy of my attention.

Best
OT

By: Nick

Nick — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 02:12:20 +0000

I admire your’ insight Jon, spot on as always, but in the end, will this election change the nations’ direction? I doubt it, the glacial inertia towards collapse seems inevitable, it only lacks the brand-name, place your’ bets!

By: tylerpaulanderson

tylerpaulanderson — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 02:10:50 +0000

Agree that DJT needs to readjust his target to the American people. However, the picture of a disgruntled American going against the grain will most definitely resonate with those of like stripes. Those dissed by the Dems are many and not a few of them see straight thru the “polish” HRC had applied to her false face. That’s Hollyweird, man, and people are on to it. It is time to put down the nice and go for the throat. If these aren’t the times to kick some ass, when will it be?

By: Guy Jordan

Guy Jordan — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:18:57 +0000

This was arranged in advanced between the Clinton campaign and NBC, just like Chuck Todd would email the DNC people, like Wasserman-Schultz, and ask them to send him questions they wanted asked on MEET THE PRESS. The whole thing was contrived in talks between the Clinton Campaign, the DNC, and NBC. All the interactions between the media and the DNC are still going on, but no one has hacked the communications yet.