Comments on: CDC vaccine science covers up giant conflict of interest

By: Ozzie Thinker

Ozzie Thinker — Sat, 29 Oct 2016 00:42:14 +0000

Another snippet of that article presents the other “arm” of the system (corrupt witnesses):

“[alarming] number of psychologists and psychiatrists being used as [unrepresentative] expert witnesses in legal trials…..”

By: Ozzie Thinker

Ozzie Thinker — Sat, 29 Oct 2016 00:38:22 +0000

Actually that menacingly camouflages how the system works.

“Surprisingly, the amendment passed unanimously in the Senate but was ultimately excised before the House vote…”

i.e. “now you see it, now you don’t”

By: Terri

Terri — Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:52:40 +0000

Speaking of sorcerers, this is a funny true story and i think we could all use a good laugh.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/5882671/in-1995-new-mexico-voted-on-a-bill-requiring-psychologists-to-dress-as-wizards.

By: Cathy

Cathy — Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:14:16 +0000

Then there’s the whole issue of having no liability whatsoever for damage caused by any of their vaccines. Not to mention the fact that the studies they are actually required to do on vaccines are not the gold-standard double-blind placebo-controlled studies required of other pharmaceuticals.

Why work to make anything safer, let alone effective, when you have a liability-free product, control the media and government pushing and even mandating the product, and any of your product that’s actually shown to be too dangerous for even this toxic country, can be pushed on so called “third world” countries? Ca-ching, ca-ching for big pharma…

By: Ozzie Thinker

Ozzie Thinker — Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:45:59 +0000

In addition, clearly some have been “noticing” for some time….

“There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law and with the colors of justice.” U.S. v. Janotti, 673 F. 2d, 578, 614 (3rd Circuit, 1982)

By: Ozzie Thinker

Ozzie Thinker — Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:36:09 +0000

He needed to provide legit information to show the CDC he was “serious”. After six years responding to various forms of litigation (for various external parties), I have zero faith in lawyers (mostly little more than salesmen). “Judges” (sic) are a law unto themselves. If you rely the legal process, you will need a sorcerer on your side.

By: Dante

Dante — Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:51:28 +0000

Maybe the sudden reach out by Thompson after all this time was related to self preservation. I also think that all the evidence Thompson provided is legit. I may very well be wide asleep. I am still putting all of my chips on the lawyers though.

By: Deborah

Deborah — Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:28:19 +0000

Great article Jon. It is a problem for me to even think we would mandate a product which has no liability to manufacturer and has documented side effects and claim of harm & death…HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN?

By: Ozzie Thinker

Ozzie Thinker — Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:02:24 +0000

You appear to still be wide asleep, Dante.

“Fear”….piffle, unless you are referring to the fact he was shit-scared of being “left out in the cold”. Guilt, no. Embarrassment at having to “come clean”….maybe!

As for lawyers….the system was built on that farce. Maybe fairies exist after all.

By: Dante

Dante — Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:34:06 +0000

You are definitely right about Thompson not coming out swinging, in all fairness to him though he did take some efforts even threatening to reveal the real manipulated data if put in front of the IOM. Along with writing letters to the higher ups. I think he probably felt true guilt and most likely fear. That whole situation sounds like it would be overwhelming for any normal person. Unfortunately I think that you are right about no one swooping in to outbid as well. For now I will put the popcorn back in the cabinet and say a prayer for the lawyers. I hope they win.