1. Neutrons: Compacted electron-proton pairs
2. H-atoms: Expanded electron-proton pairs

Of course, as you are aware, there is an impermeable wall that separates physicists from the quantum layer. Only cynicism would permit their use together in a simple sentence.

We may or may not agree that imagination was scripted at the fundamental. I understand there are ill thinking “atheists” that buy the [accidental] illusion crap, but that wouldn’t be pragmatic in practice. The real issue is we can’t see “what is” as I state here:

“Whilst I imply the Cosmic Christ is a forlorn fiction that merely satisfies social ambition, precipitous “energies” affecting emotion, libido and even time itself are very real. To name a few, there is “Source”, inherence, the astral plane, transcendental Oneness. Rupert Sheldrake was possibly one of first to use the term anthropomorphic field which has been championed by David Wilcock, Michael Tellinger and others of that ilk. Should corresponding analysis be considered correct, the field is very clearly linked to the Ascension. Nevertheless, in light of my above cynicism (all that bullshit shaping reality), I believe people are generally too confused (out-of-tune) to gauge (appreciate) a simple explanation. To convert that mindset needs much more. For instance, using the collective view as basis, comprehensive understanding of how DNA works (and, more importantly, what it is) is around nil. Even the majority of my regular visitors have nothing more than a better than average symptomatic apprehension of genetics. Most of my visitors believe most of the bullshit too. You are not immune to radical social programming….”

https://exopolitician.wordpress.com/2016/10/24/so-this-ascension-what-does-it-really-mean/

Best
OT

Take for instance someone who wants to build a house.

First, there is this guy goal and vision.
Then there is an architect who designs it.
After that you have the carpenters, the electricians, the plumbers, the painters and so on.

With all these people working toward the same goal, the house becomes a reality

In reading your comment, I was reminded of an explanation I heard some years back. The speaker was trying to give a broad definition of the concepts known as “liberalism” and “conservatism.” I’m paraphrasing here, but remaining true to what the speaker said: “Conservatism seeks to elevate humanity by encouraging and incentivising each individual to do the very best they can. Liberalism seeks to make everything “fair” simply making us all equal.”

In my opinion, it doesn’t require a great deal of analysis to figure out which system is more beneficial to both the individual and to humanity as a whole: A world full of people who have
no incentive to better themselves will also fail to benefit their fellow man in any meaningful way.