As a woman, I´d hate to be locked up with a bunch of guys for life! yikes! Don´t lose your empathy in analysing what is admittedly policy going a bit too far. And hey, lots of murderers are basically good people who made a 2 second mistake in life. Remember in Romeo and Juliet, the sparring which ends in `tomorrow you may find me a very grave man´.

Peace,

“Whistleblower Chemist Tells How Syngenta Pesticide Chemicals Are Making People Homosexual. Atrazine causes sexual abnormalities in frogs, and could cause the same problems for humans” “the widely used Pesticide Chemical Atrazine causes sexual abnormalities and homosexual behavior in humans and frogs”and in some cases changes male frogs to female frogs capable of reproduction.

–

The Scientist was hired by the Chemical company which became Syngenta to study their product, Atrazine, a pesticide that is applied to more than half the corn crops in the United States, and widely used on golf courses and Christmas tree farms.

When the Scientist found results Syngenta did not expect – that Atrazine causes sexual abnormalities in frogs, and could cause the same problems for humans – it refused to allow him to publish his findings and started a smear campaign to discredit the Scientist and prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from banning the very profitable Pesticide which is already banned in Europe.”

http://theracketreport.com/chemist-tells-how-syngenta-pesticide-chemicals-are-making-people-homosexual/

–

“Pesticide Atrazine can turn male frogs into females “Atrazine “wreaks havoc with the sex lives of adult male frogs, emasculating three-quarters of them and turning one in 10 into females”

http://news.berkeley.edu/2010/03/01/frogs/

–

Actually, it is not a common fallacy at all. The entire academic structure, psychological, psychiatric, medical, all of it… it is all fatally flawed at its foundation, and only seeks to confirm the bias of the originators of project paperclip. There is an agenda to transform society into an androgynous species so that the naturally mighty (males) no longer have the strength and conviction to eventually use force when the powers that be permit no other recourse. Additionally, most of this gender based nonsense can likely be attributed to the BPA in our plastics and a complete lack of understanding of the simple left/right brain balance. It is a disease of the mind, and taking such extreme measures as having such invasive procedures to physically alter ones body doesn’t change the true nature of their birth. Cutting yourself, adding, subtracting, taking hormones, etc.. doesn’t change anything except the materially visible spectrum of reality.

Meanwhile, back on Earth… they are still what they were born. Now, if you are still reading, I want you to understand I would never treat someone transgendered as an outcast because I’m sure they are in pain and want acceptance for who they believe they truly are. Thats fine, and they should be free to pursue whatever they want in terms of treatment and surgery, JUST DON’T MAKE ME PAY FOR IT! its that simple. Don’t make others pay for what you want, especially when they don’t agree.

What is so difficult to understand about the most fundamentally simple moral law, DO NOT STEAL!

The globalist desired to transform the world into eternal children, and they said it would only take 2-3 generations with their state sponsored indoctrination “education” system. Looks like they know you better than you do.

I’m confused. You speak of morals yet clearly support taxation, which is theft.
(Is it voluntary? No. Then it is theft.)
Your premise, as with every other statist, is an appeal to the greater good or the common good, as if such a thing actually existed. This is the self-aggrandizing falsehood that moral relativists espouse as the greatest triumph mankind can experience.

To be clear, that is exactly what we are talking about. Solipsism. It is the foundation of satanism (and no, not the nonsense psycho-babble the christians yell about) I’m talking about real satanism, “self first. No account for others. Me at all cost.” That is what you unknowingly adhere to when you believe in moral relativism, because every action, regardless of whether it is a violation of another’s rights, can be justified as long as it makes someone feel good for believing/supporting it…. oh and by the way, you didn’t have to do any actual work. Even worse, by voting, you supported violence and coercion to force others who disagree with you, to pay for what makes you feel good. That, is pure satanism. Anyone who believes in that system is a practicing satanist and an unabashed moral relativist. Guess what? 99% of this country’s citizenry are devout satanists, they just don’t know it.

So where does this tie into your need to come into a site devoted to a worldview clearly in opposition to yours? Well, morally speaking, you are bankrupt (as I’ve already discussed), but the relativism, if not wildly obvious to you is this:

You chastise Trump supporters (which I am not and unfortunately, for reasons unknown, Jon Rapport seems to be) implying that the alternative was morally superior. So as long as your candidate wins, they are moral. Never mind covering up money laundering and drug/gun running during the Mena-Arkansas Fed Loan Administration Iran Contra scandal, never mind being closely acquainted with the CFR, Trilateral etc, never mind the tons of bodies associated with the Clintons, never mind Benghazi, never mind befriending clear satanists and pedophiles….
No, they wear the right color moniker. They claim to be for equality! She’s pristine.

You statists have no idea the poisoned ideology you cling to is not only killing everyone around you, but killing yourselves as well. You are useful idiots. You are the reason humanity is in shackles spiritually and physically, you are the reason for crime, you are the reason for war, it is you! The disgusting collectivists that continuously attempt to legitimize theft and violence by believing in the religion of authority.

Don’t you dare come lash out at me about morals when you haven’t the slightest understanding of true morality. However, should you want to ascend in consciousness and accomplish some virtue, go research Natural Law and digest its implications. I know, its scary, because that means you have to live life righteously and not steal from others, but its so very worth it.

First of all, it seems you did absolutely no research into this topic. If you had, you might very well have not felt impelled to write this piece, which was, in its essence, a purely emotional response from a person evidently wholly uneducated upon this particular topic.

Everyday you interact with people who are transgendered and pass without detection, living their lives quietly and with dignity. It appears that your own predjuices or sense of moral outrage about this topic has impaired your normally excellent instincts for research and impartiality.

However that may be, it is a common fallacy and presumption of people who have not grappled with dysphoria to assume that there is not in an extensive body of research and a well defined set of psychological parameters in place to determine where on the spectrum a candidate falls with regards to their transgendered identity.

Many never seek to go so far as to seek sexual reassignment surgery and for those who do, let me assure you it is a desperate act only undertaken after careful consideration by medical professionals. Without stating anything at all about the convict, this much ought at least to be established and acknowledged. This is not a frivolous thing. The details are gruesome, the recovery arduous and people who are merely opportunistic or mentally impaired are rooted out of this process very early on.

Next, your article calls into question the entire apparatus of the legal profession, constitutional scholars, the provisions in our constitution and the particulars of scientific inquiry as they bear upon this case, thereby makes go a mockery of your own profession of journalism whose standards your have been sworn to uphold as sacred, the intellect of your reader, the solidity and reliability of constitutional law and the process of psychiatric and medical professional judgement. […]

Well, at the best it is extremely foolish and at worst it is hubristically arrogant to make all these assumptions, but you did.

[…]

~~~

it is hardly improper to call into question legal apparatus, constitutional scholars or doctors. They make loads of mistakes and it’s our job to question them!

I meant to say, to call into question without offering a shred of evidence is the error you committed. Again,we all need to do our homework and leave the soapbox at home. As journalists, that is.

Now, if you had a seperate blog called “Stuff That Makes Me Crazy but Which I Don’t Have Time to Research, so I’ll Just Vent About It Here”, that would have been fine, but you posted it to a journalistic blog page, know what I mean? It looks awful over here. I get that the idea makes you crazy, but trust me, look into it a bit further and it may not seem so awful a thing, after all. There is room for nuance here, is all I am saying. And a time and a place for our emotions. Thanks for your otherwise excellent work over the years.