https://www.youtube.com /watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw

So I don’t think that private business is any better than government control. If we let the business control anything, soon we will become batteries from matrix. Expendable cells without basic human rights (pretty much on our way there). Government control is not good too, don’t get me wrong, most of the politicians are corrupt and they don’t do anything good for the people. But government is already under the control of the private business, the politicians are on sale and so is everything else on the market.

So a new approach is needed. One which will stop brainwashing of the already retarded population. Why do you think so many murders happen in America, but no politicians get killed? Why is the american public so blind to the crimes of its politicians? Why has a politician never been held responsible for anything more than a sex scandal?

“OK, people, I’ve brought you here because we’re going to try something new and radical. Face it, we’ve been selling crap to our customers for a long, long time and gouging them in the process. Today, that stops. We’re going to shift over to a different theme. Our board will approve, because we’re going to show them this new effort will expand our bottom line. WE’RE GOING MAKE NUTRITIOUS FOOD PACKS AND SELL THEM FOR RELATIVE PENNIES TO A BILLION PEOPLE. That’s the initial goal. We can do it. On another front, we’re going to sell a billion people good clean food seeds for growing food crops. We’re going to buy acres of land in the so-called Third World and then sell parcels, for farming, to the poor for pennies and take a small share of their profits…

The Republic remnants still exist because complete and enduring totalitarianism has never been achieved. Collapse is inevitable because the seeds of self-destruction are sown in the beginning.

As heirs of public education, we are indoctrinated to believe what was created in 1787 was a Republic. But corporate entitlement was built into the framework, and the administrations that followed teetered on the verge of totalitarianism, beginning with Washington’s.

Jon’s ignorance of the Revolutionary history, particularly the behavior of what the Founders did, as opposed to what they propagandized to force nationhood, is the weakness in his arguments. A thorough digestion of Forrest McDonald’s last two books, We The People, and Novus Ordo Seclorum, as well as Merrill Jensen’s The New Nation would drive a big wedge in his preconceptions about our nation’s founding. Even a thorough examination of the Anti-Federalist Papers would help dispel such propagandist notions about the founding of our “Republic”, and from thence the works of Thomas Paine.

Having said this, such enlightenment only strengthens the argument that government is never instituted to preserve liberty, but to make legal plunder justifiable. Bastiat understood the true limits of government, the necessity of virtue, and he was a late-comer.