Comments on: Top reasons why the Trump dossier is not believable

By: NaturalWoman

NaturalWoman — Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:34:48 +0000

Sorry, I hit send too soon.

Remember during the campaign when Hillary suddenly expressed fear of Trump and Putin getting together? It didn’t make sense, given her own past. So I figured that she was afraid of what Trump might learn about her crimes from Putin. More will come out in time.

By: NaturalWoman

NaturalWoman — Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:27:36 +0000

And it Hillary thought Putin was this bad, why did she give him 25% of our uranium, thus arming our enemy?

By: Larry

Larry — Wed, 29 Nov 2017 04:26:43 +0000

During the presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton made one of the most vile and ignorant statements ever uttered by a politician (and that is saying a mouthful), when she compared Vladimir Putin to Adolph Hitler.

From bing [dot] com:

“In 1993 a study by the Russian Academy of Sciences estimated total Soviet population losses due to the war at 26.6 million, including military dead of 8.7 million calculated by the Russian Ministry of Defense. These figures have been accepted by most historians outside of Russia.”

In other words the Soviets/Russians suffered almost EIGHTEEN MILLION CIVILIAN CASUALTIES defeating the sunuvabitch.

Hillary Clinton is a waste of human skin.

By: honestliberty

honestliberty — Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:18:52 +0000

I feel confident in stating you are correct more often than not.

However, your misplaced faith in Trump is a major detriment to credibility. It flies in the face of much else of what you write. I would consider that to be an internal contradiction. It is our duty as IN-dividuals (without division) to eliminate internal conflict. This is why I’m so critical of your current worldview that houses a faith in Trump. It is dangerous and a high form of self-deception. I think it needs some introspection to sort out the inconsistencies.

By: honestliberty

honestliberty — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:21:13 +0000

Again… I have to take significant exception to your belief that he loves and cares for his country. I estimate that up be wildly childish and at best willfully naive.
You buy his choppy rhetoric but didn’t buy Obama’s? What’s different?
They still career to their constituency. They still rape the individual.
There is little difference between mega corporation and government. That’s not cliche, that’s fact.

By: honestliberty

honestliberty — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:16:38 +0000

No, I don’t need your feigned empathy.
I think you listen to too much Alex Jones.
Please, take some time to review truth stream media. That couple does some great number crunching and money -pathing. I believe you place way to much faith in Mr. Trump. He is working to destroy us just as every other president.

By: amnesiaclinic

amnesiaclinic — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:38:51 +0000

Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented: Excellent. Nailed it, Jon!

By: Michael burns

Michael burns — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:54:15 +0000

Post script:
Interesting piece by Paul Craig Roberts on William Binney take on the situation.

“William Binney is the former National Security Agency (NSA) official who created NSA’s mass surveillance program for digital information. He says that if the Russian government had conspired with Trump, hacked the Democratic National Committee’s computer, or in any way influenced the outcome of the last US presidential election, the National Security Agency would have the digital evidence. The fact that we have been listening to the unsubstantiated charges that comprise “Russiagate” for more than one year without being presented with a scrap of evidence is complete proof that Russiagate is entirely fake news.”
– Paul Craig Roberts

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/11/17/gets-push-nuclear-button/

By: From Quebec

From Quebec — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:55:17 +0000

Thank you for clearing that out.. You are right, there was a new paragraph indeed. So maybe it is my bad reading…lol. I cannot always be right. can I?

By: Michael Burns

Michael Burns — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 03:44:47 +0000

No, what I said is …
“I agree with you completely Jon”
…I am agreeing with his article what he wrote.

*New paragraph*, and the start of ‘MY comment,
” Trump is not a leader, never was; …”

I not saying that Jon said that, I guess I am not making myself clear.