Comments on: The fatal flaw in the brain-computer interface

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 16 Jan 2018 22:32:22 +0000

alpha zero’s work with chess demonstrates an excellent rebuttal to your argument. Alpha Zero was taught the rules of chess, then played against itself for 4 hours before getting to a point where it was arguably the strongest player in the world. an AI attacking other problems would figure out solutions regardless of earlier lies.

By: Me

Me — Sun, 14 Jan 2018 06:19:56 +0000

We can all go around programmed as Al Gore’s bad side.
All the criminals they could be sent to reconditioning centers for brain scans and govt reprogramming which is the general idea.

By: truth1

truth1 — Sat, 13 Jan 2018 02:08:01 +0000

Well, most people will never question it. They think the Matrix is a real thing, along with Santa and the fairy god mother.

By: Tim

Tim — Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:21:53 +0000

…And the point Jon makes, pushes the idea over the edge, into complete absurdity. That is, both ends of the proposed system are fake news.

By: Val Valerian

Val Valerian — Fri, 12 Jan 2018 20:43:01 +0000

A really good point, and well put, Jon.

By: amnesiaclinic

amnesiaclinic — Fri, 12 Jan 2018 20:05:51 +0000

Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented: The sheer arrogance of thinking this can be done so easily!

By: ellemy

ellemy — Fri, 12 Jan 2018 20:01:33 +0000

True, and our subconsciousness is like the mainframe, it operates on what it is fed. It doesn’t care about validity. Thus, neural linguistic programming is able to bypass the conscious mind through subliminal and hypnotic programming techniques which are everywhere, every moment in all forms of media and entertainment streams. GIGO…the call to guard our minds and seek truth!

By: Tim

Tim — Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:55:43 +0000

Having examined the literature on brain interfaces, the message coming from the science is that extensive brain surface is required to the input/output system. Meaning that a very expensive operation on the head is required, removal of skull, and placement of artificial structure on the tissue covering the brain. In other words, very limited abilities. It’s impractical, even if technical issues can be sorted out. The invasiveness of the technology means it’s not practical.

Brain interface requires too much of brain surface, for connection, so it can’t really be done practically.

By: barbara Joyce

barbara Joyce — Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:22:32 +0000

Many thanks for a logical viewpoint, Jon.

Those life-forms that seek to control humanity understand technology, but they DO NOT UNDERSTAND nor can they access higher energetic frequencies. Their technological ‘expertise’ can only be successful when linked into the lower frequencies on which the human ‘personality’ and its body/vehicle operates. They are IMPOTENT on the higher frequencies that our higher aspects, the Real Us operates on. So, emphasising our focus on the lower personality aspects is their only route to what they see as success.

As David Icke keeps saying – ‘Remember who we are’ and what we are is infinite consciousness at our true level, only the human aspect is ‘under attack’.

Each person needs to read/. research if necessary ‘spiritual’ philosophy to recall who and humans are, Each time this is recalled, it increases the level of the overall human field, more and more out of the grasp of those who are as yet, undeveloped and in a great illusion.

Peace and Progress to All

By: Chester

Chester — Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:07:37 +0000

Enjoyed. Takes place during Obama/Clinton run for the White House.