They never say the words FOR the United States of America, That would mean We the People give these set of rules and guidance to those that are our representatives.

They only repeat the words as instructed “Of the United States”…

They never say the words United States of America because they don’t recognize that the states are united by a sovereign people..They say only the words of United States which is the corporation that resides in the District of Columbia which is not a part of the United States of America.

They know that within the 1st Article of the trilateral agreement for the Treaty of Peace that sovereignty was only given to the States and/or the State Corporations CEO as it is today..

If you pull D&B reports on all State agencies you will find they are all incorporated businesses for profit. Same applies for all federal agencies in Washington DC.

Is this the game called snooker.

You are correct in asserting that logic, reason, critical thinking and not forgetting plain old common sense is sadly lacking in young people today.

The problem with your complaints regarding the failings of contemporary “analysis” and subsequent rebuttal is that often propaganda doesn’t employ a unified central theme. Therefore, in order to uncover the underlying intent, you often have to quite literally pick it apart. Seperate the wheat from the shaft as it were. And in case you haven’t been paying attention of late, “fake news” which is the overwhelming majority of what is read theses days, is just a Euphemism for plain old fashioned propaganda. And it bears noting that today, no country in the world employs more resources in this area, particularly on the internet, relative to their economic size, than Israel. And the overwhelming majority of those forces have been directed at American since day one.

The real message you are trying to sell here is that the current situation is really our own fault. To which I say baloney. The Republic is on the verge of collapse because the forces of Zionism have driven it there.

What was that again you were saying about selective analysis Jon?

“Fortunate is a nation which in the moments of trials and tribulations doesn’t stand round waiting for someone else to tell her what to do, but instead with simplicity and ease picks up a nearest wooden club and starts nailing her abusers, until in her soul the sense of injustice and fury is replaced by contempt and pity.”
Lev Tolstoy

Trying to find blogs or discussions where intellect and learning are in evidence is extremely difficult. I used to love ‘The Free Republic’ in the 1990s when every topic was an exercise in law and history and ethics, then came Bush and the blog descended as do 99% of the blogs into ;
‘Yes it does’
‘No it doesn’t’
‘Yes it does’
‘No it doesn’t’
‘Yes it does’
‘No it doesn’t’
“you suck’
‘no you suck’
‘no you suck.’

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’”
Isaac Asimov, Newsweek, 21 January, 1980.

George Carlin nailed it.
‘There is a reason that education sucks’.

https://www.youtube.com /watch?v=ILQepXUhJ98

“1984

Proletarians, in practice, are not allowed to graduate into the Party. The most gifted among them, who might possibly become nuclei of discontent, are simply marked down by the Thought Police and eliminated.
From the proletarians nothing is to be feared. Left to themselves, they will continue from generation to generation and from century to century, working, breeding, and dying, not only without any impulse to rebel, but without the power of grasping that the world could be other than it is
since military and commercial rivalry are no longer important, the level of popular education is actually declining.They can be granted intellectual liberty because they have no intellect.”

It is incurable without a revolution and a new land. The founders got away with it because they ‘Got away’.
In England they would not have survived, the nobility, the oligarchs had complete control and would have crushed not only the people but the thoughts as well.

Cromwell and the Commonwealth had a brief moment of glory, but the ‘Deep State’ returned and threw them down.
Democracy and the American Republic has been an interesting experiment, but you do not really think that it can survive do you?

The ‘Song of angry men’ has been replaced by Jay Z’s ‘Big pimpin’

May God have mercy on our souls, we allowed it to happen.

In an effort to determine who were the “We the People” in the Constitution you must first note the meaning of the words in the preamble vs the words we are told to repeat when taking the oath.

Is it FOR or OF the United States, or is it FOR or OF the United States of America.

Then attempt to find which words/statement are In Law or At Law as a part of the oath taken. You will find that the words repeated when taking the oath of office do not exist anywhere in any legal document on earth.

Words mean everything, yes – no?

I submit in the future all taking the oath of office repeat the words in the context for meaning – We the People – Sovereign People of the united States of America are giving this document to the elected representatives of each State for the demands and guidance’s that SHALL be followed and enforced.

We the People should be building another type of wall the starve the swamp of potential evil doers.before any of the people’s representative can place their name on a political ballot they must submit to a city, State, DOD and FBI background investigation same as a private person must to work in the government space.Because We the People are the employer of said candidate the results of the background investigation SHALL be made public.

If this were in place for our representative when it was deemed necessary for the private sector employees, We would not know of many currently serving in Congress and the Senate including a Senator calling himself Barack H. Obama, II.

As the employer we have the authority to do theses things. But only if We the People are educated. All politics starts at the local level. Their is no need to have Capitol Hill in the District of Columbia be the decision maker on this vetting of those to represent We the People..

Logic (the foundation of mathematics), does not and cannot distinguish between correct and incorrect assumptions. Garbage In, Garbage Out.

The Constitution, like the Declaration, begins with certain assumptions:

“We the People…” Who were the “People” and did they have any input into the document? Did they even want it?

“…of the United States” Were the States united? Did any presumed unity arise before or because of a constitution?

“…a more perfect Union” MORE PERFECT? How is that even possible? What does that mean?

“Establish Justice” There was not Justice before the Constitution?

“…Insure Tranquility” What was the nature of prior domestic disturbances? Who or what caused them?

“…establish the common defence” The war of Independence had been formally concluded four years before the Convention, the Articles fully ratified two years before that. Why was this even mentioned?

“…provide for the General Welfare” Whose general welfare needed providing for? The inhabitants had carried out commerce and common defense without a constitution, so then what was the purpose of it–qui bono?

“…secure the blessings of Liberty” Can Liberty be secured by a Constitution? Can a Constitution secure Liberty for posterity? Can a Federal government do such things?

“To exhume the purpose of the Constitution, one would have to read it and study it, and then decide what the document is driving at” says Jon.

By asking questions about the assumptions underlying the Constitution’s preamble, it is readily apparent studying the Constitution will NOT reveal the intent of those who concocted it. A knowledge of the history of English political thought is necessary. Hence, the numerous books published attempting to ascertain reasonable answers to this matter, such as “The Mind of the Founder” (James Madison). Here again, in the title, we ascertain an assumption that turns out to be a false attribution. Madison was NOT the Founder of the Federal Constitution. An investigation into the Convention’s driving political thought reveals that if any one man was responsible for it, it was Alexander Hamilton.

Upon examining the train of English political thought, can such an idea as “We the People” within its tenets work as a function of binding contract (an English value)?

Logic is a necessary tool, yes. A study of the Constitution, the thinking and arguments of its proponents reveals that those individuals were no better at logic nor possessed of wisdom than any other man. The Anti-Federalists exposed the errors repeatedly.

An examination of the Declaration reveals many of the same kind of errors, such as the founding assumption that all men are created equal. Neither men nor women are equal among their respective genders or between genders. There is no equality among men in intelligence, skill, capacity, and most especially not in opportunity or outcome. The Holy Grail of Equality is what is destroying the fabric of natural society.

Saddam’s Sister
https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/749207
Set price to $0 if you want to read for free

Tonight, in his State of the Union address, he closed his speech:with these words:

Americans fill the world with art and music. They push the bounds of science and discovery. And they forever remind us of what we should never forget: The people dreamed this country. The people built this country. And it is the people who are making America great again.
As long as we are proud of who we are, and what we are fighting for, there is nothing we cannot achieve.