Dr. Weston Price DDS – Dental Health Industry Deception, Flouride, Implants, Veneer, Toxic Heavy Metal Mercury In Amalgam Seen As Harmless And Even Healthy, Rooting Out Corruption In The Industry
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/08/dental-health-industry-deception-by-dr.html

ref: “the total amount of hydrofluoric acid being used during the cold war era. During that time period, if an unfriendly foreign national were to add up the amount of Fluoride sold every year, and then reverse engineer the amount needed for X amount of purified uranium, then the unfriendly foreign national could fairly accurately determine how much purified uranium was being produced by the US and available for WMD.”

i thought the “Fluoride (acid) compounds” were waste product outputs — along with the enriched uranium output, not part of the chemical input needed to enrich the uranium.

As for why fluoride is still being pushed down our throat today is a different situation. Why would a non nuclear country such as New Zealand be pushing fluoride down it’s citizens throats? Unless NZ is also trying to hide their nuclear grade uranium production? The same question goes to Australia.

Another purpose for fluoridated water would be to lower the IQ of the populace. Citizens with a lower IQ are easier to manipulate to sway a desired election outcome. The same reason why only male landowners were alowed to vote during the birth of our country. Now with the votes of non landowners, women, and africans, it is now much more difficult to manipulate the outcome of elections.

An alternative need for fluoride today would be to mask the illnesses caused by fluoride. What would happed if every water utility stopped adding fluoride and then all of the sudden chronic illnesses dramatically dropped, such as people’s vision would revert back to 20/20? It would bring evidence for a national tort recovery lawsuit that would make the asbestos tort recovery award look like a speck of sand on top of a bolder. It may likely force cities, counties, states, and the country who encouraged fluoridation into bankruptcy.

Instead, the government would likely embrace the lie with full force and just give us national healthcare instead. Due to our lowered IQ, the government would easily sway us pay for it instead of healthcare being a free compensation for our injuries.

Just thinking outside the box.

http://economiccrisisreport.com/the-true-history-of-fluoridation-toxicity-was-hidden-and-lied-about-by-the-government/

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/the-true-history-of-fluoridation-toxicity-was-hidden-and-lied-about-by-the-government_02052018

So when you ask which facts are scientific, let’s start with the most basic one that is proven – the fluoride is not an essential nutrient. Humans derive no benefit from ingesting it. So right there, you have an argument against the enormous expense of fluoridating water. Second, many studies have proven a direct correlation between higher fluoride levels and lower IQ.

So if you want to suggest that there is a safe and acceptable level of fluoride that most people can handle, fine. But you are the one that needs the scientific backing for your suggestion, because it supports something that is entirely unnecessary and that has been demonstrated to already causing real harm in real people.