Comments on: Fluorides, the atomic bomb, and fake news https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/ NoMoreFakeNews.com Tue, 09 Jun 2020 01:39:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.10 By: auntyuta https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39696 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:41:54 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39696 Reblogged this on auntyuta and commented:
Stuart Bramhall says: “eblogged this on The Most Revolutionary Act and commented:
Much of the original “proof” that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists, who were secretly ordered to provide ‘evidence useful in litigation’ [by persons who had been poisoned by fluoride and would sue for damages]. The first lawsuits against the US A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage.”
I am going to reblog this too!

]]>
By: stuartbramhall https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39695 Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:45:10 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39695 Reblogged this on The Most Revolutionary Act and commented:
Much of the original “proof” that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists, who were secretly ordered to provide ‘evidence useful in litigation’ [by persons who had been poisoned by fluoride and would sue for damages]. The first lawsuits against the US A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage.

]]>
By: A Green Road Daily News https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39694 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:25:06 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39694 The Fluoride Deception: How a Nuclear Power And Atomic Bomb Making Industry Toxic Waste Byproduct Made Its Way Into the Nation’s Drinking Water, Via The Debunked Hormesis Theory; Poisons Are Good For People
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/06/the-fluoride-deception-how-nuclear.html

]]>
By: A Green Road Daily News https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39693 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:19:54 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39693 All part of the quack hormesis theory that heavy metal poisons are good for health, just like mercury, asbestos, tobacco, arsenic, and all of the radioactive heavy metals created by deluded men.

Dr. Weston Price DDS – Dental Health Industry Deception, Flouride, Implants, Veneer, Toxic Heavy Metal Mercury In Amalgam Seen As Harmless And Even Healthy, Rooting Out Corruption In The Industry
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/08/dental-health-industry-deception-by-dr.html

]]>
By: Theodore https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39692 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 19:09:37 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39692 Hi Roy,

ref: “the total amount of hydrofluoric acid being used during the cold war era. During that time period, if an unfriendly foreign national were to add up the amount of Fluoride sold every year, and then reverse engineer the amount needed for X amount of purified uranium, then the unfriendly foreign national could fairly accurately determine how much purified uranium was being produced by the US and available for WMD.”

i thought the “Fluoride (acid) compounds” were waste product outputs — along with the enriched uranium output, not part of the chemical input needed to enrich the uranium.

]]>
By: Roy https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39691 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 18:34:50 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39691 I had read the book you mention a number of years ago and have since pondered the rational for the big push for fluoridated water during that time period when the Manhattan project was in full swing. Along with the justifications noted in the book, my current assumption for the nuclear complex to promote Fluoride down our throats was to obscure the total amount of hydrofluoric acid being used during the cold war era. During that time period, if an unfriendly foreign national were to add up the amount of Fluoride sold every year, and then reverse engineer the amount needed for X amount of purified uranium, then the unfriendly foreign national could fairly accurately determine how much purified uranium was being produced by the US and available for WMD. This secret correlation would have justified officials to find alternative uses for fluoride to obscure the total amount of fluoride used for WMD production. The slogan would have been “It is everyones patriotic duty to take an equal share of the poison neccessary for our national security.” It makes sense to me and fills in the missing pieces of the nuclear flouride timeline.

As for why fluoride is still being pushed down our throat today is a different situation. Why would a non nuclear country such as New Zealand be pushing fluoride down it’s citizens throats? Unless NZ is also trying to hide their nuclear grade uranium production? The same question goes to Australia.

Another purpose for fluoridated water would be to lower the IQ of the populace. Citizens with a lower IQ are easier to manipulate to sway a desired election outcome. The same reason why only male landowners were alowed to vote during the birth of our country. Now with the votes of non landowners, women, and africans, it is now much more difficult to manipulate the outcome of elections.

An alternative need for fluoride today would be to mask the illnesses caused by fluoride. What would happed if every water utility stopped adding fluoride and then all of the sudden chronic illnesses dramatically dropped, such as people’s vision would revert back to 20/20? It would bring evidence for a national tort recovery lawsuit that would make the asbestos tort recovery award look like a speck of sand on top of a bolder. It may likely force cities, counties, states, and the country who encouraged fluoridation into bankruptcy.

Instead, the government would likely embrace the lie with full force and just give us national healthcare instead. Due to our lowered IQ, the government would easily sway us pay for it instead of healthcare being a free compensation for our injuries.

Just thinking outside the box.

]]>
By: Economic Crisis Report https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39690 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:23:55 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39690 The TRUE History Of Fluoridation: Toxicity Was Hidden And LIED ABOUT By The Government

http://economiccrisisreport.com/the-true-history-of-fluoridation-toxicity-was-hidden-and-lied-about-by-the-government/

]]>
By: SHTF Plan https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39689 Mon, 05 Feb 2018 20:00:10 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39689 The TRUE History Of Fluoridation: Toxicity Was Hidden And LIED ABOUT By The Government

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/the-true-history-of-fluoridation-toxicity-was-hidden-and-lied-about-by-the-government_02052018

]]>
By: honestliberty https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39688 Mon, 05 Feb 2018 01:55:38 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39688 JB? Response? I see Greg responded politely and with a logical response?
Do you have anything to say on the matter?

]]>
By: Greg C. https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/02/01/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-fake-news-2/#comment-39687 Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:14:40 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=20463#comment-39687 Great comment, JB. Looking for context in facts is a sign of higher intelligence. Facts by themselves are meaningless. That said, the context of the genesis of the myth that fluoride fights cavities is alarming. We know that it is a myth – the data proves it, and the research shows who started it. And now we know the reason for the myth – to limit liabilities due to fluoride poisoning. Science got infected with this myth, because industry and government pays for science, and they needed scientific corroboration.

So when you ask which facts are scientific, let’s start with the most basic one that is proven – the fluoride is not an essential nutrient. Humans derive no benefit from ingesting it. So right there, you have an argument against the enormous expense of fluoridating water. Second, many studies have proven a direct correlation between higher fluoride levels and lower IQ.

So if you want to suggest that there is a safe and acceptable level of fluoride that most people can handle, fine. But you are the one that needs the scientific backing for your suggestion, because it supports something that is entirely unnecessary and that has been demonstrated to already causing real harm in real people.

]]>