Comments on: Detecting cancer: can you trust all the tests? https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/ NoMoreFakeNews.com Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:46:39 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.10 By: jacobite2015 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41858 Fri, 11 May 2018 11:41:44 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41858 Interesting information. Curious: What kind kind of cancer dx and what stage was it? You had alternative treatment over conventional? If alternative, what did you utilize? Dietary changes? Nutritional supplements?

]]>
By: joel https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41857 Thu, 10 May 2018 18:04:28 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41857 I had cancer 2 years ago and I have fully recovered. What I learned is that cancer is poorly defined. I supposedly had this affliction, but no one could tell me what it was. No good definition then I had to define it myself, and I was very motivated!
Do you know what I learned?
Just replace the mystery word cancer with….lymphatic stagnation.
So the entirety of western medicine is on this boondoggle wild goose chase for a bad microbe or a virus or ….you name it. We want some outside thingy, entity, to blame. Keep the fake research going till your balls or ovaries turn blue if you like….
But that is not itttttttttttttttttttt!
Restore lymphatic flow again and all the fake diseases go away.
Cancer is systemic, a buildup of acidic wastes in the body and the body makes a tumor, or shuts down an organ, or causes burning and pain…a million symptoms for one disease….
stagnant lymph
aloha and may we all learn the truths that will set us free
peace
Look up Dr. Morse and Dr. Sebi to hear two beings say the same thing in different ways

]]>
By: jacobite2015 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41856 Thu, 10 May 2018 13:57:34 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41856 Great post & fascinating info.

One thing I can’t understand is why oncologists bombard their patients with PET scans, which produces a significant amount of ionizing radiation (~25 mSv). So, it’s bad enough that cancer patients will suffer iatrogenic damage from the chemo – and now they’re hit with high-radiation PET scans during & post-treatment.

In fact, the whole medical imaging spectrum can be dangerous. CT scans aren’t much better. Only MRIs (without contrast) are safe and I try to push for an MRI over a CT scan at all times. But the “buzzword” these days are “CT scans,” and so many patients brag about how many CT scans they’ve had and how their doctor is looking out for them. Such stupidity. But radiologists are partly to blame too.They know very well how dangerous some of these scans are but fail to inform their patients and suggest safer alternatives such as MRIs & Ultrasounds. But hey – it’s the medical cartel…imagine that. Lol.

https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray

]]>
By: JKick https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41855 Thu, 10 May 2018 10:11:24 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41855 Have You Ever Heard Of The 1939 Cancer Act in the UK?

I hadn’t until recently.

Cancer Act 1939
1939 CHAPTER 13 2 and 3 Geo 6

An Act to make further provision for the treatment of cancer, to authorise the Minister of Health to lend money to the National Radium Trust, to prohibit certain advertisements relating to cancer, and for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid.

[29th March 1939]

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/2-3/13

4 Prohibition of certain advertisements.

(1)No person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement—

(a)containing an offer to treat any person for cancer, or to prescribe any remedy therefor, or to give any advice in connection with the treatment thereof; or

(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F3

(2)If any person contravenes any of the provisions of the foregoing subsection, he shall be liable on summary conviction, in the case of a first conviction, to a fine not exceeding [F4fifty pounds][F4level 3 on the standard scale], and, in the case of a subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding [F4one hundred pounds][F4level 3 on the standard scale] or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months, or to both such a fine and such imprisonment.

Touted as a protection for the people against “charlatans and quacks,” the law made it illegal to promote, write about, or even speak about cancer therapies other than radiation.

On the other hand it could easily be argued it was a protection for an expensive industry that the government had given loans to, which would look not to clever if emerging alternative therapies to radiation quickly gained renown and doomed the radiation industry to failure.

https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1929/jul/24/national-radium-trust

]]>
By: Ozzie Thinker https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41854 Thu, 10 May 2018 05:22:56 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41854 Jon

Emphatically NO.

Currently “health” diagnoses symptoms. No one [formally] knows the cause of cancers (which mysteriously historically follows the development of the automobile industry – sic) and therefore many and various triggers (such as vaccines) are convenient to blame.

I realise your point in writing this article is adrift of mine – i.e. can “we” trust healthcare “professionals”? But I am expanding your reasoning. If health doesn’t know the REAL causes, all diagnoses are “false positives” regardless of merit.

My recent article discusses another associated issue (given the true cause of cancer can only be initially detected in the quantum layer):

https://exopolitician.wordpress.com/2018/05/06/does-the-draconians-false-light-matrix-leverage-off-the-ancient-atlantis-tamarian/

“….The Pharisees ignore and deny the essence of God. All manners of evidence to the effect can be sought in our material sciences, nominal religious dogmas and the endless commercial-political conspiracy designated to prepare slaves. Ri is the glue that binds existence, but spirituality also inhibits the Pharisee’s cause. Nevertheless, comprehension of the censored astral is critically important if the Atlantis tamarian concept is to be appreciated. There is no representation for spiritual glue in the word “tamaras” and for good reason. On face value tamaras is the product of manipulators that desire to use the shell (Ra) as their icon for control. It goes without saying that the tamaras must fashionably double as that which is colloquially known as the “False [light] Matrix”. Albeit the former signifies philosophic intent and the latter refers to proto-physical infrastructures, they are the same. In relation to the tamarian however, all concepts leverage off the same basic identify framework in different ways.

Fortunate for us Atlantis expressions “evolve” and we can clearly see tamaras and tamarian have shared components. Therefore once we are able to decode all syllables as individual standalone words, we will be in a stronger position to impress plausible grouped meanings that contextually rely on all parts. This quest needs some vital background before we embark. For instance, our contemporary sciences’ impotence regarding cosmic matters will reflect poorly on findings (i.e. findings will likely contradict or defy mainstream opinion). Scientists’ errors are so widespread that everything particularly very small or very big is disaffected. The removal of Stephen Hawkins will change nothing. In my protest, I see no purpose in attempting to benchmark findings under error to be “politically correct”, so I rightly ignore whimsical physicists. Atoms, I reveal in The Beauty of Existence Decoded, are universal catalysers. In that capacity, all the components of dimensional frequency configurations are simultaneously generated within “time windows”. No quantum theory has come close to unravelling the “mystery” behind the truth beyond string and superstring “anticipations”….

….When Moses wrote the “Ten Commandments” he aimed to jump start religious standards in his favour. Whereas, at first glance, sentiment seems noble enough, upon stricter analysis, every commandment promotes notorious double standards that neither reflect whimsical human morality well nor promote divine being. Partnered with the Mosaic scourge, Aristotle’s control measures are still alive and well but buried so deep in cultural Roman Catholicism, they are almost unrecognisable now. Does not today’s International (“globalism”) Standards Organisation (ISO) certification attempt to impose arbitrary universal commerce measures that “transcend” (conflict with) staffing competence? Some would say that religions effectively plunder God’s divinity. Terms of surrender serve up grotesque contortions of the image of true faith….”

Best
OT

]]>
By: June Gardner https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41853 Thu, 10 May 2018 02:30:14 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41853 FABRICATING CANCER IS ONE OF THE DIRTY TRICKS GYNECOLOGISTS USE TO EXPLOIT HEALTHY WOMEN INTO UNNECESSARY RADICAL HYSTERECTOMIES FOR PERSONAL GAIN…
Mine was DELIBERATE INTENT, not a mistake.. Deliberate misdiagnosis keeps the money rolling in for snakes in white coats and the corrupt medical cartel..

]]>
By: the postman https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41852 Thu, 10 May 2018 00:14:22 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41852 You’re welcome!

]]>
By: Abe https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41851 Thu, 10 May 2018 00:11:21 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41851 “Let thy food be thy medicine and thy medicine be thy food?”
Hippocrates

]]>
By: NaturalWoman https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41850 Wed, 09 May 2018 22:30:53 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41850 Thanks for connecting the dots regarding aspartame and diabetes. That’s one I hadn’t thought of previously.

]]>
By: the postman https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/05/09/detecting-cancer-can-you-trust-all-the-tests/#comment-41849 Wed, 09 May 2018 21:13:35 +0000 https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/?p=21238#comment-41849 In 1904, cancer caused just 4% of deaths in the U.S. By around 1995 or so mortality due to cancer had risen six-fold to 24%. Think about that for a moment… If cancer had a beginning then certainly it must have an end as well, right? More important, if we know cancer’s beginning in time and so too history tells us everything that has changed in our lives since that time, (especially regarding our diets), shouldn’t even a modestly educated high school student be capable of determining the cause of cancer? And yet, all that the cancer industry can manage after more than a century is address the symptoms of cancer by way of cutting, irradiating and poisoning.

Should we be at all surprised by this lacklustre performance on their part? In fact, we shouldn’t! Anyone who researches the cancer establishment will quickly learn that it evolved out of the American eugenics (Malthusian) movement (which most Americans are unaware even existed). IMO, an ever-growing part of the rise in cancer rates is due to the fact that more and more, cancer is being mis-diagnosed, and this is being done intentionally in order to help eliminate what the Malthusian elite consider to be an excess of us “useless bread eaters” (this overall conspiracy is the focus of my historical research). Cancer treatment obviously adheres to an “iatrogenic model” in which the treatment contributes to (or, in many cases causes completely) a person’s death. This model works because friends and relatives wouldn’t normally question that someone on chemotherapy would die from “cancer”. Same thing with AIDS. If someone whose lifestyle is such that you’d believe them if they told you they had AIDS, would you be at all surprised later to find that they died of it? But what if they didn’t die of AIDS and instead, they died of the treatment itself?

This model is analogous to the classic “feedback loop” known to electronics engineers–an element of the “solution” itself contributes to the “problem”. Thus, the more problem realized, the more solution is applied… BTW, this theory regarding AIDS in particular is substantiated somewhat in the documentary, “HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud?”. Look for it on line. Two other examples of this medical deception involve mental health and diabetes. Again, who’d be surprised that someone with mental problems might kill themselves, or others due to “their mental illness” (in fact, a lot of people seem aware that the drugs are a contributing factor)? But diabetes treatment takes the cake. The first thing a doctor treating someone for diabetes does is to put them on a low calorie diet where sugar is replaced by artificial sweeteners, and quite often the unsuspecting patient/victim chooses aspartame. It’s becoming more widely known that the use of aspartame contributes to weight gain as well as blindness. That’s right, blindness! Now, who hasn’t heard that a serious symptom of diabetes is… blindness? Again who would question that someone developed diabetes who was already working (and apparently failing) to control their weight? Yep, it’s the same “feedback loop” as noted earlier except that now, the patient assumes more responsibility for furthering his/her own illness. Sadly, the diabetes patient could have avoided becoming overweight in the first place had they simply eaten like their grandparents or great grandparents–that is, chosen real food over highly processed foods with their hydrogenated fats (please read Udo Erasmus’ “Fats that Heal, Fats that Kill” for more details).

Be forewarned folks! Much of our medical system is set up to cause, not cure illness! — the postman

]]>