Oh, wait, , what am I thinking, , why should they expose themselves.

What is tumor suppression?

A disorder of the suppression is all that is needed to create a cancerous state resulting from a trigger. A disorder can be considered as a mutation which science so puts it. The suppressor has many pathways to each part of the human body. Once a disorder occurs, a part of the suppression unit “goes negative” which then affects only the pathways originated from the trigger.

Truth be told, the trigger never really cause the disorder. Only the disorder results from the suppression unit itself. This is the real reason why people in all walks of life, can only get certain illnesses while others do not.

I had Angiosarcoma which is a blood vessel cancer. I invented a cure for the disease due to understanding the disorder. Now the word ‘cure’ is a hard word for medical science because it is a rarity. I no longer have angiosarcoma because the suppressor has been “reprogrammed” and repaired. There is one underlying fact of the suppression counterparts in our bodies that it relies on total functionality of every detail regarding “acts of deficiencies”….

So there… you want to cure yourself of some disease, understand what it does, what is missing, and what pathway it affects. I consider the pathways coming off of a suppression unit to be akin to a circuit board albeit, only organic.

On this day, I should be on a hospital bed, bleeding from numerous lesions throughout my body….dying… Instead I am on my own bed at home, typing this up. Tomorrow I go chop more wood whereas I would not have been able to if I still have the disease. Angiosarcoma has a 5 year survival rate and it increases with each severity per stage.

In all honesty, medical science needs to study this in great detail. It is the ‘holy grail’ of all science if everyone were to understand how tumor suppression actually works.

My 2 cents. Peace – and I look forward living 150 plus years because of this knowledge.

I am not sure what “evidence” is any more, given strong reliance on [potentially flawed] perception and [biased] consensus view.

My latest work-in-progress on Ozzie Thinker titled “The Crisis of Social Grooming: Fear Manipulation at the Root” has this to say:

“Miscasting of historic myths is a classical manoeuvre of those committed to perverting truth in order to impress upon social grooming. In more ancient times religions were a vehicle sometimes used to ridicule truth and deny sovereign faith. Circumcision is an undeniable direct attack on God (supporting that which is natural), but I find no reference to the fact in the Torah. Because religion began to lose its potence (the authorities drafted a new Bible in 1884 in an attempt to jump start Christianity once more) with so much global upheaval, since the French Revolution, task of bending truth has been handed to “science”. That is why today learned professions are “split” for and against vaccines, marking mainstream and anti-mainstream territories. How can there be any debate though? The truth is plain and out in the open, but far from simple. Aluminium, supplied to vaccines via Eli Lilly’s branded product Thimerosal, causes brain damage. The symptom autism is a configurable consequence. There are other plausible symptoms, such as Alzheimer’s. Here’s where complexity is noted. Often combinations of factors will impress varied disease symptoms, but in the specific cases of autism and Alzheimer’s, the underlying (or root) cause is aluminium poisoning. When there are multiple factors determining potential outcomes of any political argument, it becomes easy to subvert the path away from honest realisation. Oil is blamed for Iraq, but the war had little to do with the petroleum industry. That was the cover story. Indeed, the “powers” know that if they do not move away from fossil fuels soon, humanity is done for. In fact, as I illustrate in this article (https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2018/10/25/coming-clean-on-cancer/), all cancers are caused by carbon pollution.

Politics is all about consensus view (or, rather, the manufacture of it), Science and religion are the same, with two distinct exceptions. Religion is anchored to Scripture which, fanatics assert, is Word of God. This is easily disproven, of course. We only need to open our Bibles to discover numerous contradictions on offer when evidence that summarises prophets’ revelations is scrutinised carefully. God apparently allows and disallows certain practices; verdicts depending on timely cultural persuasions. Yet, jesting aside, a calculating, divisive God is a duplicitous one. Science, almost identically, regularly serves up contradictory “proof” as justification for dogma. These proofs are regularly sensationally disproven and, in some instances, many times over. Neither Scripture nor proof, it seems, are very reliable. That is perhaps why they have combined today. Both sciences and religions assert principled belief in doctrines supposedly backed by evidential proof. Though it logically belonged to Jacques De Molay (attesting his mock crucifixion by Catholicism), the so-called Turin Shroud is evidence of Jesus’ (who didn’t exist, by the way) life and death. Once Hitler’s cyanide gas salesman, Pope John Paul II was all too quick to upgrade that dubious (according to prior editions of the Catholic encyclopaedia) “fact”. If the world’s great superpower USA was modelled on Rome (forget Israel) why wouldn’t the Vatican be the absolute centre of authority?”

Best
OT

Since families share the same cultural and social conditioning, the same indoctrinations, the same beliefs, and so forth, they often experience the same type of conflicts, causing the same “diseases”.

Family Dispute

“anger conflicts”
“self-devaluation conflicts”
“separation conflicts”
“abandonment conflicts”
Georgia Russia War

“death-fright conflicts”
“nest-worry conflicts”
“attack conflicts”
“existence conflicts”

Orthodox medicine views Lou Gehrig’s (ALS) and Huntington Disease (HD) as “genetic disorders” that are passed on through the generations. According to Dr. Hamer’s discoveries, the biological conflict linked to the muscles is “not being able to escape”, “feeling tied down”, or “feeling stuck”, resulting in muscle paralysis during the conflict-active phase. The biological significance of the paralysis is a “fake-dead”-reflex because in nature a predator often attacks a prey only when it tries to escape. The instinctive response is: “Since I can’t escape, I play dead”, causing paralysis until the danger is over.

However, it is the diagnosis and prognosis shock and the scary wheelchair image (“feeling stuck” that prolong the conflict, exacerbating the condition. Of course, the fear instilled by the widely held belief that the “disease” could have a “genetic cause” only adds to the individual’s vulnerability. A daughter or son of a parent with such a muscle “disorder” is naturally much more susceptible to experience a “stuck”-conflict. We must also keep in mind that any conflict shock can be experienced with or for another person, particularly when the distress concerns a close loved one.

Nonetheless, even if members of a family or generations of families experience the same type of conflicts, the conflict shock itself (the DHS) is still a highly personal event which in that instant involves solely the brain, or rather the brain relay, of the person suffering the conflict at that particular time. This is why diseases cannot be passed on to future generations nor can they be genetically inherited from a family member or ancestor, either genetically or epigenetically.