Comments on: SARS-CoV-2 has not been proven to exist; I can do this forever

By: MagicBullet

MagicBullet — Fri, 09 Jul 2021 02:28:00 +0000

Its a mix of things-cellular RNA and unknown other RNA, and were tainted with Mycoplasma. Genomes were gotten from Next-generation sequencing (NGS) which only relates back to the original Sars in a data base and that itself was gotten from a data base.

Try to read what was done for yourself and look things up like NGS, and read about it carefully. It also clearly says VeroE6/TMPRSS2 CELLS, it now where says anything about purification, its not really rocket science.

By: Average Joe

Average Joe — Mon, 08 Feb 2021 19:11:32 +0000

I think Nick shared the fact checker URL he is espousing as proof for the isolation, sequencing, and studies. https://fullfact.org/health/Covid-isolated-virus/

WHAT WAS CLAIMED
The Covid-19 virus has not been isolated as per Koch’s postulates, and this means PCR tests do not work.
This is untrue. Covid-19 has been isolated many times. It does not need to adhere to Koch’s postulates as it is a virus, and Koch’s rules have been widely disregarded now. Covid-19 PCR tests are generally very accurate.
So in summary, Covid-19 has been isolated, Koch’s postulates don’t have to universally apply for something to cause disease, and tests to identify the Covid-19 virus do work.

I’m not saying I agree with the fact checking, just pointing out Nick’s URL reference.
And what it means is basically every alleged isolation has to be analyzed to confirm it is not according to a usual scientific method of isolation so people can not refute what is evident.
What’s confusing for non-scientists and non-virologists and non-doctors is who to believe because of the minutiae of interpretation for what is meant by the conclusion that COVID-19 has not been “properly” isolated nor “properly” sequenced.
So I read this but still I’m as confused as before because some say it has been isolated and some say it has not and some say it has not because it did not use this method and others say it has and does not need to use that method and so on.
It just makes it hard for the average Joe to figure it all out.

By: Brutus

Brutus — Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:15:01 +0000

You have got a discussion about the subject as well in below link:
https://principia-scientific.com/top-lab-test-expert-covid-19-virus-does-not-exist/

By: Tim

Tim — Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:57:05 +0000

WHere is the PROOF

By: Richard Baker

Richard Baker — Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:23:35 +0000

Not so, it’s just that millions use a false paradigm, then one day the paradigm changes and millions use a new paradigm. Remember: each generation of scientists is usually 100% sure that they are right, until they are not when times change.

By: Thankful

Thankful — Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:06:29 +0000

Here is some more stating the same thing……no isolation

https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/03/what-vaccine-trials/

By: Thankful

Thankful — Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:04:25 +0000

No virus has been isolated……here is article posted at Off-Guardian, though Jon has posted many articles regarding the facts that no virus has been isolated…

https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/03/what-vaccine-trials/

By: chris

chris — Sun, 03 Jan 2021 09:26:09 +0000

can someone please explain this

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/the-virus-that-causes-covid-19-exists-and-was-identified-and-isolated-multiple-times-by-independent-research-groups/

By: GregH

GregH — Fri, 01 Jan 2021 17:38:10 +0000

what was you ‘discovered’?

By: Tomas

Tomas — Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:09:33 +0000

Thanks for Your article,

but there is art about isolation

https://www.pnas.org/content/117/13/7001?cct=2302

is it pure isolated virus ? or “soup” and mixture of difrent protein ?